---
name: amazingcat-proverka-akta
description: >
  Проверка судебного акта, проекта судебного акта или мотивировки на соответствие
  практике высших судов РФ через amazingcat. Использовать, когда пользователь просит
  проверить решение, определение, постановление, проект акта или выводы суда, найти
  расхождения с практикой ВС РФ, КС РФ или Пленума ВС РФ, подготовить критику акта
  или доводы для обжалования.
---

# Check a court act against higher-court practice via amazingcat

> **Output language.** Communicate with the user and produce all analysis, documents,
> citations and footnotes in the user's language (for Russian court practice — Russian).
> This skill is written in English only for brevity; it must not change your output
> language or the language of generated documents. The ready-made templates below are in
> Russian on purpose — use them verbatim.

## Purpose
Check a court act or a draft act against the practice of the higher courts of the Russian
Federation. Result: the act's legal theses are extracted; for each — supporting practice is
found; for each — limiting/contradicting practice is searched for; it is stated whether the
thesis matches higher-court practice; sources are given with identifiers, URL, QR and pinpoint
locators when present in amazingcat data.

## Core principle
Never confirm a court's conclusion with general words. Every conclusion about compliance or
contradiction must rely on a specific act found and verified through amazingcat.
Never invent: case numbers, dates, act numbers, legal norms, pages, points, paragraphs, quotes,
or facts of the case.

## When to use
The user asks to: check a court act; check a draft act; compare the reasoning with higher-court
practice; find the court's errors; prepare criticism of a decision; identify promising grounds
for appeal; check the allocation of the burden of proof; check application of a norm; check the
completeness of evidence assessment against higher-court practice.

## When not to use
The user only asks to: briefly retell an act; extract identifiers; format a file; translate text;
or find a single specific act without analysis.

## Workflow
### Step 1. Extract legal theses
From the act, extract legal theses. A thesis is a transferable rule, not a description of facts.
Template: `При [условие] применяется [правовое последствие].` If one paragraph holds several
rules, split them into separate theses.

### Step 2. Classify the theses
For each thesis determine the legal type (guides the search; need not be shown to the user):
материальное право; процессуальное право; бремя доказывания; оценка доказательств; способ
защиты; последствия нарушения; применение разъяснений Пленума; применение позиции КС РФ; иной.

### Step 3. Find supporting practice
For each thesis search via amazingcat: a semantic query; a search by norm if the norm is known;
a search by exact phrase if the act has a characteristic wording; a search by tag if the
institution is obvious. If a found act will be included in the answer, open its full card (`get_case`).

### Step 4. Find limiting and contradicting practice
For each thesis run a separate counter-search for acts that: give the opposite conclusion; require
extra conditions; limit the rule; find a similar lower-court approach erroneous; show exceptions;
warn against a formalistic approach. Do not write that counter-practice is absent unless a separate
search was actually run.

### Step 5. Check the relevance of each source
Before using a source verify: the legal question matches; the norm applies; whether the act is a
direct analogy or only a general reference; the chosen quote does not contradict the case outcome;
you are not relying only on a short summary instead of the text/position; there is an official URL;
there is a QR code; there is a point, page, text anchor or quote.

### Step 6. Extract citation-ready data
For each source to be used, extract (fill placeholders with Russian data from amazingcat; if a
field is absent — leave it empty, never invent):
```text
[Вид акта]
[Суд]
[Дата]
[Номер дела / Номер акта]
[Название акта]
[краткое описание предмета]
[source_url]
[qr_image_url]
[номер пункта, если есть]
[страница, если есть]
[текстовый ориентир, если есть]
[цитата, если есть]
[уровень применимости]
[уровень уверенности pinpoint]
```
If amazingcat returned `citation_ready`, use it as the basis. If amazingcat did not return a page,
point, paragraph or quote — do not invent them.

## Thesis statuses (output verbatim, in Russian)
```text
Подтверждён практикой высших судов
Ограничен практикой высших судов
Противоречит практике высших судов
Не подтверждён найденной практикой
Требует дополнительной проверки
```

## Response format (output in Russian)
```text
Проверяемый акт:
[Суд / орган]
[Дата]
[Номер дела]
[Краткое описание]

Тезис [номер]
Формулировка тезиса:
[тезис]

Вывод:
[статус]

Подтверждающая практика:
1. [Вид акта] [Суд] от [Дата] № [Номер дела / Номер акта]
   Применимость: [прямая / общая]
   Суть позиции: [кратко]
   Pinpoint: [пункт / страница / текстовый ориентир / указание на отсутствие pinpoint]
   URL: [source_url]
   QR: [qr_image_url]

Ограничивающая или опровергающая практика:
1. [Вид акта] [Суд] от [Дата] № [Номер дела / Номер акта]
   Роль: [ограничение / опровержение]
   Суть позиции: [кратко]
   Pinpoint: [пункт / страница / текстовый ориентир / указание на отсутствие pinpoint]
   URL: [source_url]
   QR: [qr_image_url]

Комментарий:
[почему проверяемый акт соответствует, ограниченно соответствует или противоречит практике]
```

## In-text reference rules (Russian templates — use verbatim)
Do not write without identifiers: «ВС РФ указал…», «Согласно практике ВС РФ…», «Пленум разъяснил…»,
«Судебная практика исходит из того, что…».
Correct:
```text
В [Вид акта] [Суд] от [Дата] № [Номер дела / Номер акта] по вопросу [описание правового вопроса] сформулирована позиция: [краткая позиция].
```
For an act with numbered points:
```text
В [номер пункта] [Вид акта] [Суд] от [Дата] № [Номер акта] «[Название акта]» разъяснено: [краткое разъяснение].
```

## Pinpoint rules
If amazingcat returned an act point: `[номер пункта] + [страница] + [цитата или текстовый ориентир]`.
If no point: `[страница] + [текстовый ориентир]`.
If the page is not established:
```text
Точная страница в данных amazingcat не установлена; ориентир по тексту: «[text_anchor]».
```
Do not present an internal paragraph index from OCR / extracted text / chunking as a visual
paragraph of the official PDF.

## locate_pinpoint — exact page, paragraph, point
`locate_pinpoint(court, doc_id, quote)` maps a chosen **verbatim** quote to the official PDF and
returns `page`; `visual_paragraph_on_page` (counted from the top of the page, not a global index);
`act_point` (for Plenum rulings / reviews, if any); a ready `recommended_footnote` with URL and QR.
1. Pick a verbatim quote (from `get_case`) that supports the thesis.
2. Call `locate_pinpoint([Суд], [doc_id], "[дословная цитата]")`.
3. If `page`/`act_point` are returned — put them in the footnote next to the thesis.
4. If `pinpoint_type` is `quote_only`/`unavailable` — state honestly «pinpoint не установлен»;
   do not invent page/paragraph/point.
5. If the response contains `pro_only` — exact page/paragraph/point pinpointing is a PRO-tier
   feature; on the free tier use identifiers, URL and QR without a page number.
The quote must be verbatim from the act text (not from a summary), otherwise it will not be located.
Tools: `search_practice`, `find_by_norm`, `find_term`, `find_similar`, `search_by_tag`, `get_case`,
`locate_pinpoint`.

## Default PDF/DOCX formatting
If the user gives no other requirements:
```text
Шрифт: Roboto · основной текст 11 pt · межстрочный 1.15 · между абзацами 0
Поля: верх 1 см, низ 1 см, левое 2 см, правое 2 см · шапка по правому краю · текст по ширине · нумерация в правом нижнем углу
```
Place the source near the thesis on the page of first use; QR next to the footnote or in a «Источник»
block; keep the URL even with a QR.

## Final check
Each thesis found and assessed; a supporting search and a separate limiting/contradicting search were
run per thesis; each used act opened in full; each source has a URL; QR added when amazingcat returned
it; no invented pages/points/paragraphs/quotes; quotes verbatim; weak analogies not shown as direct
confirmation; example placeholders not used as real identifiers.